Skip to main content

Grow. Lead. Excel.

Cognia Accreditation

Cognia Accreditation

  • Official accreditation badge for the Cognia, with the text NCA CASI, NWAC, SACS CASI

General Information

The Glynn County School System's Cognia (formerly AdvancEd) Accreditation Engagement Review was completed on March 18, 2025.  The district was notified by Cognia on April 14, 2025, that our Accreditation Engagement Review had been rated.  Both our overall score and feedback on each component were made available at that time.

Final approval of our accreditation status will be granted by Cognia and the Cognia Global Commission during their quarterly meeting on June 25, 2025.

Glynn County Schools received an overall Index of Quality Education (IEQ) score of 320.  Cognia's IEQ Network Average score is: 296.

What is Accreditation?

District accreditation is a commitment to a journey of ongoing improvement.  As the most widely used improvement process in the world, accreditation is distinctly different from other improvement processes. According to Cognia, accreditation is the "launchpad for school improvement."  It relies heavily on Cognia's research-based standards and evidence-based criteria to evaluate the district as a whole and the schools and programs we serve.  The accreditation process examines the entire institution, "from policies to learning conditions and cultural context - to determine how well the parts work together to meet the needs of every learner." 

Accreditation is not a one-time inspection.  Using both internal and external review processes and evaluators, guided by Cognia's Performance Standards and Key Characteristics, the journey of accreditation is meant to help meet improvement goals and to develop sustainable commitments to better learner outcomes. 

In short, accreditation is continuous improvement.

  • The official seal of the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools, featuring a flame and the year 1895.

    “Strong,” “visionary” and “progressive” are a few of the words used to describe Glynn County Schools in an Accreditation Engagement Review Report conducted in January 2019.  A team from AdvancED, the parent company of the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools (SACS), performed a three-day monitoring review of Glynn County Schools, from which they provided a detailed report highlighting the district’s demonstration of continued compliance with the accreditation standards as well as ongoing progress and improvement.

    As part of the review, Glynn County Schools had to complete an onsite evaluation from the AdvancED team.  This included administrators, teachers, students, parents, board members and several stakeholders.  As a result of their analysis of artifacts, interviews, and classroom observations, the report indicated that the school system is moving forward in its practices and providing the best for its students. 

    To determine accreditation status, AdvancED has three main standards from which to report its findings: Leadership Capacity, Learning Capacity, and Resource Capacity.  Each of the three standards break into several sections and to receive accreditation (and a Standards Diagnostic rating), the school system must provide evidence proving it meets each section of each standard.

    In the Leadership Capacity domain, the district met and exceeded expectations on 9 of 11 standards.  For the Learning Capacity, 11 of 12 standard expectations were met; the other standard was rated “emerging” for the school system’s arising approach to providing a creative, innovative and collaborative problem-solving learning culture.  The last category, Resource Capacity, revealed that the district meets 4 of 8 standards, exceeds 3 of 8 standards, and needs improvement on integrating digital resources into teaching, learning and operations to improve professional practice, student performance, and organizational effectiveness.

    The accreditation report provided an Index of Education Quality (IEQ) as a holistic measure of overall performance.  Comprised of the Standards Diagnostic ratings, the IEQ score for Glynn County Schools is 339.52, which indicates that the district is within the Impact level and is engaged in practices that are sustained over time and are becoming ingrained in the culture of the institution.  This is the highest rating for IEQ.  Glynn’s IEQ was previously 288 in 2014. The average AdvancED Improvement Network (AIN) five-year IEQ range is 283.33 – a calculation that the school system has surpassed in the report’s findings.  

    At the Work Session meeting on March 28, 2019, comments from the review team’s 15-page report were shared, emphasizing the important role that all stakeholders play in the continuous improvement process utilized throughout the Glynn County School System:

    • “Deeply ingrained in the fabric of Glynn County Schools is a strong, visionary and effective leadership team, who is committed to continuous improvement.”
    • “To create 21st learning environments for all Glynn County students is not only the vision of the system but also the direction of the strategic plan.”
    • “As a progressive school system, Glynn County Schools is purposeful and intentional in the allocation of the system’s human, material and fiscal resources.”

    On March 29, 2019, the AdvancED Global Commission approved Glynn County Schools' accreditation status.

    As part of the review of the Engagement Review Report, the following steps, which are now organized around “i3: Initiate, Improve and Impact,” will be considered as Glynn County Schools maintains its continuous improvement process:

    • Examine those standards that fall into the Initiate category and reflect on the status of those standards in Glynn.  Some of the standards in the Initiate category may be in that category because the work is in the early stages of implementing new programs or practices.  In those cases, continue to monitor the implementation and begin to collect data on the effectiveness of the new program or practice.  Other standards in this category may be due to limited engagement and/or implementation and plans should include how to improve in these areas.
    • As standards in the Improve category are examined, determine how to best continue to analyze and use data to look at growth and improvement over time.
    • In reviewing the Standards in the Impact category, look to ensure ongoing monitoring and support for these effective practices.